中国教育类核心期刊 CSSCI来源期刊 RCCSE中国权威学术期刊

精品文章

您的位置:首页 >精品文章>

    智能时代教育主体失范的分析框架与类型演化

    Analytical Framework and Type Evolution of Anomie of Educational Subjects in the Age of Intelligence

    浏览次数:20164

【作      者】:

逯 行, 王良辉, 周跃良


【关 键 词 】:

智能技术; 教育实践主体; 行为失范; 分析框架; 类型演化


【栏      目】:

理论探讨


【中文摘要】:

智能时代的教育主体行为存在失范风险,亟需明确行为失范的具体表现、类型及相互之间的关系,从而制定规范策略。研究采用了多案例研究方法,对26个案例信息进行编码,最终形成智能技术环境下教育主体行为失范的分析框架与模型。研究发现,智能时代教育实践主体的行为失范主要呈现出四种类型,即背离伦理/道德规范的行为失范、违反行业与技术标准的行为失范、脱离教育制度约束的行为失范以及触犯法律底线的行为失范,且失范行为在“原生性失范”“转型期失范”“过程性失范”“本质性失范”及“周期性失范”等五种层次之间进行演化。研究旨在为国家部门和相关组织制定政策和开展治理提供依据,以促进智能教育健康发展。


【英文摘要】:

In the age of intelligence, the behaviors of educational subjects are at risk of anomie, so it is urgent to clarify the specific manifestations, types and interrelationships of behavioral anomie, so as to formulate regulatory strategies. This study adopts a multi-case study method to code the information of 26 cases, and finally forms an analytical framework and model of the anomie of educational subjects under the intelligent technology environment. It is found that there are four main types of behavioral anomie of educational practice subjects in the intelligent era, namely, the behavioral anomie that deviates from ethical/moral norms, the behavioral anomie that violates the industry and technical standards, the behavioral anomie that breaks away from the educational system and the behavioral anomie that violates the bottom line of the law. Moreover, the anomie evolves among five levels: "original anomie", "transitional anomie", "process anomie", "essential anomie" and "periodic anomie". This study aims to provide a basis for state departments and related organizations to formulate policies and carry out governance to promote the healthy development of smart education.


【下      载】:

智能时代教育主体失范的分析框架与类型演化

网站首页 | 联系我们 | 意见建议| 杂志订阅| 管理部登录

版权所有 © 电化教育研究 CopyRight ©e-EDUCATION RESEARCH 2011-2018 电话:0931-7971823 地址:西北师范大学《电化教育研究》杂志社