【作 者】：
孙 立 会
【关 键 词 】：
人工智能； 教学决策； 信任危机； 主体自信
【栏 目】：
理论探讨
【中文摘要】：
人工智能为教学注入新生力量的同时也引发了诸多反思。算法偏见、隐私侵犯及情感忽视触发了智能教育中人机信任危机，进而导致决策自主权虚置。人工智能教学决策中应凸显“人”之主体性，建立由教师信心主导的决策模式能帮助教师挣脱技术中心的拜物主义泥沼，实现决策独立场，并释放错误归因的心理枷锁，坚守教学主体责任，同时发挥教学的感通性，降低智能情感依赖。班杜拉三元交互决定论为教师决策效能的影响要素解构提供了分析框架，教师智能认知误区和职业危机感主导了信心机制的建立，自身行为的成败及替代经验连接着教学的信心与行为。人—机—智能情境因素各主体的能量转移影响着系统的和谐交互。由此，从技术主体、关系维系与机制保障三层面设计教学决策中“人”之主体性的实现路径，建立解释与理解双向发展的智能教育体系，着力塑造人—机—情境协同共生的智能教学互信生态，并不断完善智能决策伦理的法律法规制度建设，重启人工智能教育信任机制。
【英文摘要】：
While artificial intelligence (AI) has brought new energy into teaching and learning, it has also caused a lot of rethinking. Algorithm bias, privacy invasion and emotional neglect have triggered man-machine trust crisis in intelligent education, which leads to a lack of decision-making autonomy. The subjectivity of "human" should be highlighted in the decision-making of artificial intelligence teaching. The establishment of a decision-making model dominated by teachers' confidence can help teachers break away from the quagmire of technology-centered materialism, realize the independent field of decision-making, release the psychological shackles of false attribution, so as to uphold the main responsibility of teaching subject. At the same time, it gives play to the perceptual nature of teaching and learning, and reduces the emotional dependence of intelligence. Bandura's triadic interactive determinism provides an analytical framework for deconstructing the factors influencing the effectiveness of teachers' decision making. Teachers' intelligent cognitive misconceptions and professional crisis dominate the establishment of confidence mechanism, and the success or failure of their own behaviors and alternative experience connect the confidence and behavior in teaching. The energy transfer of each subject of man-machine-intelligence contextual factors affects the harmonious interaction of the system. Therefore, the realization path of "human" subjectivity in teaching decision-making is designed from three levels of technical subject, relationship maintenance and mechanism guarantee, an intelligent education system with two-way development of interpretation and understanding is established, and a mutual trust ecology of intelligent teaching and learning in which human-computer-context coexist is shaped. Meanwhile, the legal and institutional construction of the ethics of intelligent decision-making is continuously improved, and the trust mechanism of artificial intelligence education is restarted.
【下 载】：
人工智能之于教育决策的主体性 信任危机及其规避