中国教育类核心期刊 CSSCI来源期刊 RCCSE中国权威学术期刊

杂志文章

您的位置:首页 >文章目录 >2017年第8期>

    英语机考的信效度研究

    Reliability and Validity Study of A Computer-based English Test

【作      者】:

关丹丹, 李 英


【关 键 词 】:

英语; 机考; 信度; 效度


【栏      目】:

学习环境与资源


【中文摘要】:

文章以PETS-5为例,在设计并实现机考形式后,选取出国培训班学生共404人参加了该机考测试。测试结束后,通过在线问卷调查的形式调查了被试对该机考形式的感受与意见,并收集了考生参加PETS-5纸笔考试的考试成绩。研究结果表明:(1)该机考总体的Alpha信度为0.82,各部分为0.63~0.65,具有较好的内部一致性信度;(2)该机考各部分的相关系数为0.34~0.43,与纸笔考试各部分相关的结果基本相近,具有较好的结构效度;(3)该机考成绩与纸笔考试成绩的相关系数为0.709,具有较好的效标关联效度;(4)该机考模式对于男生和女生是公平的,试题在性别上不存在项目功能差异;(5)关于测验总分及各部分性别差异t检验结果显示,男女考生仅在阅读理解成绩上存在性别差异,男生的平均成绩高于女生。


【英文摘要】:

In this study, PETS-5 computer-based English test is designed and implemented. A total of 404 students from overseas training class are selected to take the test. After the test, a questionnaire survey is conducted online to investigate the feelings and opinions of the participants towards the computer-based test. And the PETS-5 paper-pencil test scores of the examinees are collected. The results show that (1) the overall Alpha reliability of the computer-based test is 0.82, and the reliability of every section is 0.63-0.65, which indicate good internal consistency reliability. (2) The correlation among various sections is 0.34-0.43, similar to the results of each part of the paper-pencil test, which reveals good construct validity. (3) The correlation between the computer-based test scores and paper-pencil test scores is 0.709, which means good criterion-related validity. (4) The computer-based test is fair for males and females,and there is no gender DIF in the test. (5) The t-test results show that male and female candidates only have gender differences in reading comprehension scores, and the average score of the male is higher than that of the female.

网站首页 | 联系我们 | 意见建议| 杂志订阅| 管理部登录

版权所有 © 电化教育研究 CopyRight ©e-EDUCATION RESEARCH 2011-2018 电话:0931-7971823 地址:西北师范大学《电化教育研究》杂志社