【作 者】：
李 斌， 刘 超
【关 键 词 】：
西方冲击； 本土化建构； 金陵大学； 电化教育； 电化教育史
【栏 目】：
历史与国际比较
【中文摘要】：
研究旨在从教育交流史的视角审视金陵大学电化教育的发展逻辑和规律。鸦片战争之后，先进媒体教育应用和大学社会服务理念作为西方先进器物进入国人视野。南京国民政府成立后，在陈裕光和魏学仁等本土校长和院系领导的倡导下，金陵大学在文化沟通、社会服务及科学教育理念的指引下，重视校内电化教育技术媒体资源的汇聚，并加强与学界、工商业界的联系。全面抗战爆发后，金陵大学在学科专业设置、人才培养及专业期刊建设方面逐步成型，并逐步加强社会服务力度和与政府的深层互动。从全球史的视野观察，金陵大学推动电化教育是工业和教育全球化的产物，带有偏向农民教育的国情特点。金陵大学电化教育发展主题从单纯重视“器”的引入，到“管、产、学、研”的整体性本土化，但其整体而言过于重视媒体技术使用，忽视了背后的人文和社会价值，因此未能改变中国的社会结构和文化心理。
【英文摘要】：
The study aims to examine the development logic and laws of the audiovisual education in Nanking University through the lens of the history of educational exchange. After the Opium War, the advanced media applications in education and the philosophy of the university social service entered the Chinese cognitive horizon as western technological advancements. After the establishment of the Nanjing National Government, under the advocacy of localized leaders such as President Chen Yuguang and Dean Wei Xueren, Nanking University, guided by the principles of cultural communication, social service and scientific education, attached importance to the convergence of technological media resources for audiovisual education and strengthened its ties with the academic, industrial and commercial circles. After the outbreak of the Anti-Japanese War, Nanking University gradually took shape in terms of discipline establishment, personnel training, and professional journal construction, and gradually strengthened its social service efforts and deep interaction with the government. From the perspective of global history, the promotion of audiovisual education by Nanking University was the product of industrialization and education globalization,reflecting national characteristics oriented toward farmer education. The theme of the development of audiovisual education at Nanking University has changed from an initial focus on the introduction of "tools" to a holistic localization of "management, production, study and research". However, it generally emphasized too much on the use of media technology and ignored the humanistic and social values behind it, thus, failing to change China's social structure and cultural psychology.