【作 者】：
张 铭 凯
【关 键 词 】：
学业负担； 技术治理； 治理向度； 技术价值； 治理限度
【栏 目】：
理论探讨
【中文摘要】：
学业负担的现实境遇、共治诉求和技术价值的不断彰显，使得技术治理成为学业负担治理的重要选择。突破经验治理的主观偏误、弥补事后治理的自身缺憾和揭示理性治理的内在规律，由此促进理念转向、加速行动更新、实现范式转型，这是学业负担技术治理的价值所在。实现这种价值关键在于探明着力点，基于学业负担治理的过程视角，探索提出其技术治理的三维向度，即从“直觉感知”到“数字刻画”、从“后知后觉”到“提前预警”、从“等量齐观”到“分门别类”，以此促成学业负担的有效识别、全程监测和差异治理。当然，推进学业负担技术治理实践的深化，还需要审慎思考学业负担的长期沉疴与复杂演化、技术发展的狂飙突进与内在迷思、技术赋能学业负担治理的深层机理这些关乎治理效能的紧要问题，不断澄明学业负担技术治理的本体限度、中介限度和作用限度，最终助力学业负担技术治理实效的达成。
【英文摘要】：
With the continuous manifestation of the realistic situation of academic burdens, the demand for shared governance and the value of technology, technological governance has become an important choice for the governance of academic burdens. The value of technological governance of academic burdens is to break through the subjective bias of empirical governance, make up for the shortcomings of ex-post governance and reveal the inner rules of rational governance, thus promoting the shift of ideas, accelerating the renewal of actions and realizing the transformation of paradigms. The key to realizing this value lies in identifying the focus. Based on the process perspective of academic burden governance, this paper puts forward a three-dimensional technological governance, that is, from
"intuitive perception" to "digital depiction", from "hindsight" to "advance warning", from "equal measurement" to "classification", so as to facilitate effective identification, whole-process monitoring and differential management of academic burdens. Certainly, in order to deepen the practice of technological governance of academic burdens, it is necessary to carefully consider the long-term problems and complex evolution of academic burdens, the rapid progress of technology and its inherent myths, and the deep mechanism of technology-enabled governance of academic burdens, all of which are crucial issues for the effectiveness of governance. Continuing to clarify the ontological limits, mediating limits and functional limits of technology governance of academic burdens, will ultimately help to achieve the effectiveness of technological governance of academic burdens.