【作 者】：
翟雪松， 楚肖燕， 张紫徽， 陈文智
【关 键 词 】：
中台； 数字校园； 数字治理； 教育信息化； 教育现代化
【栏 目】：
教育信息化
【中文摘要】：
教育信息化发展过程中存在阶段性差异，同时技术本身也在不断迭代，致使信息化建设各项标准未能完全统一，各业务模块之间存在壁垒，教育大数据难以支持精准决策，应用功能也无法实现个性化和特色化治理，且统一标准重新建设难度大、成本高，如何在保留原有信息化建设的基础上优化校园数字治理能力，是当下教育信息化的痛点和难点。近年来兴起的中台技术通过建设数据和业务中台，能够在不改变原有信息系统架构的情况下，灵活抽调后台数据，建设以共享功能模块和前台微应用为中心的发展模式。在总结当前教育信息化数字治理困境的基础上，文章综述了中台战略的概念、架构及作用，从数据治理、业务应用转型、组织优化转型三个方面提出中台战略下的数字治理方案。展望了以逻辑数据仓和业务模块共建“数据+业务”双中台的系统架构前景，提出了构建“条块”化管理模式的信息官组织体系和协同工作业态，以期充分挖掘数字潜能和业务效率，提高教育评价的科学性，提升校园数字治理效能。
【英文摘要】：
There are stage differences in the development of educational informationization, while the technology itself is also constantly iterating. As a result, the standards of informationization construction have not been fully unified, barriers exist between business modules, big data in education is difficult to support accurate decision-making, and the application functions cannot achieve personalized and distinctive government. Moreover, it is difficult and costly to rebuild the unified standards, and how to optimize the digital governance of the campus on the basis of retaining the original informationization construction is difficult in current educational informationization. In recent years, through the construction of data and business center, the emerging middle platform technology can flexibly adjust the background data and build a development mode centered on shared function modules and foreground micro applications without changing the original information system architecture. On the basis of summarizing the current dilemma of digital governance of educational informationization, this study reviews the concept, architecture and function of the middle platform strategy, and proposes a digital governance scheme under the middle platform strategy from three aspects: data governance, business application transformation and organizational optimization transformation. Moreover, it looks forward to the prospect of the system architecture of "data + service" double middle platform built by logic data warehouse and business modules, and puts forward the construction of an organizational system of information officers and a cooperative work mode with a "block" management mode. It is expected to fully tap the digital potential and business efficiency, improve the scientific nature of education evaluation and enhance the effectiveness of campus digital governance.