【作 者】：
赵慧臣， 张亚林， 马佳雯， 张娜钰
【关 键 词 】：
青少年课外STEM项目； 评价系统； 评价量表
【栏 目】：
历史与国际比较
【中文摘要】：
如何评价青少年课外STEM项目质量，成为促进其可持续发展中亟待关注的问题。文章在系统科学视野下，参考美国《印第安纳州课外项目规范和专业标准：STEM教育》，构建青少年课外STEM项目质量评价系统。文章认为：青少年课外STEM项目质量评价应以课外STEM项目的供给、应用、保障和监督为评价对象，以量表作为项目评价的方法支持，以科学的实施步骤指导项目评价的开展，评价指标体系应在供给层面关注所需物质资源基础，在应用层面确保应用效果，在保障层面关注社会资源支持，在监督层面关注自我调整的途径。针对我国STEM课外项目的评价，研究提出：设定科学的评价目标，促进青少年课外STEM项目的持续发展；关注校内外STEM资源、设备的配置，评价能否创设项目学习的优质环境；关注家庭、学校和社区的联动情况，评价能否整合不同情境的课外STEM项目；评价人员专业发展的效果，提高项目设计质量与实施效果；关注是否融入激励性内容，判断能否优化STEM教育的效果。
【英文摘要】：
How to evaluate the quality of youth after-school STEM program has become an urgent issue in promoting its sustainable development. From the perspective of systematic science, this paper constructs the quality evaluation system of youth after-school STEM project based on Indiana After-school Specialty Standards: STEM Education. This paper holds that the quality evaluation of youth after-school STEM project should take the supply, application, guarantee and supervision of after-school STEM project as the evaluation object, use the scale as the method support of project evaluation, and guide the development of project evaluation with scientific steps. The evaluation index system should focus on the material resource at the supply level, ensure the application effect at the application level, pay attention to the social resource support at the security level, and provide the self-adjustment approach at the supervision level. In view of the evaluation of after-school STEM projects in China, this paper puts forward some suggestions as follows: setting scientific evaluation objectives to promote the sustainable development of youth after-school STEM project; paying attention to the allocation of STEM resources and equipment inside and outside school to evaluate whether it can create a high-quality environment for project learning; focusing on the linkage among families, schools and communities to evaluate the extracurricular STEM projects in different contexts; evaluating the effect of professional development training for staff to improve the quality of project design and implementation; and focusing on the incentive to see whether the effect of STEM learning can be optimized.